ISRG vs. TLT
ISRG (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) is a stock, while TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, ISRG returned 16.51%/yr vs -2.20%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ISRG vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRG achieves a -37.64% return, which is significantly lower than TLT's -1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRG has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 16.51%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -2.20% annualized return.
ISRG
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -13.18%
- 6M
- -33.99%
- YTD
- -37.64%
- 1Y
- -31.90%
- 3Y*
- 1.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.90%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 1Y
- 2.90%
- 3Y*
- -2.24%
- 5Y*
- -7.64%
- 10Y*
- -2.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.56%
ISRG vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | -37.64% | 8.51% | 54.72% | 27.14% | -26.15% | 31.76% | 38.39% | 23.43% | 31.23% | 72.64% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -1.57% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRG and TLT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002 | -0.13 |
The correlation between ISRG and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRG vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
ISRG
TLT
ISRG vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISRG | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.06 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 0.38 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | 0.87 | -2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISRG vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRG drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRG and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRG | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.26% | -48.35% | -33.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.74% | -7.58% | -34.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.42% | -17.91% | -25.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.90% | -43.70% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.90% | -48.35% | -1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.15% | -41.21% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.33% | -13.95% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.06% | 3.35% | +14.71% |
Volatility
ISRG vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) has a higher volatility of 19.26% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.63%. This indicates that ISRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRG | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.26% | 2.63% | +16.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.17% | 6.82% | +20.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.38% | 9.41% | +25.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.17% | 15.75% | +18.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.87% | 14.84% | +18.03% |
Dividends
ISRG vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.65% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRG and TLT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISRG has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to TLT (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRG dropped -82.26% vs TLT's -48.35%.
TLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRG and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer