ISRA vs. HODL
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - ISRA is a Global Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Index, while HODL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ISRA returned 41.95% vs -38.56% for HODL. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HODL.
Performance
ISRA vs. HODL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -25.27% return.
ISRA
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
HODL
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -18.34%
- YTD
- -25.27%
- 6M
- -29.73%
- 1Y
- -38.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISRA vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 14.05% | 36.98% | 27.69% |
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | -25.27% | -6.42% | 99.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and HODL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
HODL
ISRA vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISRA | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.86 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | -0.79 | +4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | -1.36 | +15.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISRA | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | -0.89 | +2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.30 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and HODL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -49.25% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -49.25% | +38.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | -47.93% | +43.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -15.97% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 28.35% | -25.45% |
Volatility
ISRA vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) is 5.30%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that ISRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 9.43% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | 34.37% | -19.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.84% | 43.51% | -22.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 49.88% | -28.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 49.88% | -28.97% |
ISRA vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISRA vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRA and HODL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HODL has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to ISRA (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs HODL's -49.25%.
On 1-year performance, ISRA leads with 41.95% vs -38.56% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ISRA has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISRA has performed better with a 41.95% return vs -38.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.
ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.
ISRA is categorized as Global Equities, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.25% for HODL.
ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and HODL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer