ISRA vs. ITEQ
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISRA is a Global Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Index, while ITEQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISRA returned 10.44%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for ITEQ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ITEQ.
Performance
ISRA vs. ITEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than ITEQ's 10.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISRA having a 10.44% annualized return and ITEQ not far ahead at 10.76%.
ISRA
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -9.56%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 24.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
ITEQ
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- -1.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
ISRA vs. ITEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 6.18% | 36.98% | 26.03% | -0.08% | -25.76% | 10.06% | 28.21% | 26.77% | -7.04% | 15.07% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 10.21% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and ITEQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ISRA and ITEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISRA vs. ITEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISRA
ITEQ
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
ISRA
ITEQ
Technology
ISRA
ITEQ
Healthcare
ISRA
ITEQ
Industrials
ISRA
ITEQ
Utilities
ISRA
ITEQ
Real Estate
ISRA
ITEQ
-
Energy
ISRA
ITEQ
Consumer Cyclical
ISRA
ITEQ
Communication Services
ISRA
ITEQ
Consumer Defensive
ISRA
ITEQ
-
Basic Materials
ISRA
ITEQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. ITEQ — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
ITEQ
ISRA vs. ITEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISRA | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.48 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 3.81 | +4.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. ITEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, smaller than the maximum ITEQ drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and ITEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -54.63% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -13.07% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | -26.78% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | -50.29% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | -54.63% | +9.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | -18.35% | +7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -18.50% | +7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 5.08% | -1.67% |
Volatility
ISRA vs. ITEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) is 8.21%, while BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that ISRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 10.20% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.31% | 18.83% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.23% | 23.89% | -2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 25.20% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 23.49% | -2.47% |
ISRA vs. ITEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ITEQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISRA vs. ITEQ - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than ITEQ's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.39% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.77% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRA and ITEQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITEQ has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to ISRA (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs ITEQ's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, ITEQ leads with 10.76% vs 10.44% for ISRA. On fees, ISRA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ISRA has been the lower-risk option at 8.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITEQ has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISRA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.77% for ITEQ.
ISRA is categorized as Global Equities, while ITEQ is Technology Equities. ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index, while ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.75% for ITEQ.
ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and ITEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer