ISRA vs. SCHG
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISRA is a Global Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISRA returned 10.44%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for SCHG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
ISRA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRA has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.44%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.
ISRA
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -9.56%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 24.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
ISRA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 6.18% | 36.98% | 26.03% | -0.08% | -25.76% | 10.06% | 28.21% | 26.77% | -7.04% | 15.07% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.35% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and SCHG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ISRA and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISRA vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISRA
SCHG
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ISRA
SCHG
Technology
ISRA
SCHG
Healthcare
ISRA
SCHG
Industrials
ISRA
SCHG
Utilities
ISRA
SCHG
Real Estate
ISRA
SCHG
Energy
ISRA
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
ISRA
SCHG
Communication Services
ISRA
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
ISRA
SCHG
Basic Materials
ISRA
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
SCHG
ISRA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISRA | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.10 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 3.58 | +4.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -34.59% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -16.41% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | -23.39% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | -34.59% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | -34.59% | -10.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | -6.46% | -4.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -5.20% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 5.02% | -1.61% |
Volatility
ISRA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 5.91% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.31% | 12.52% | +3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.23% | 16.24% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 22.38% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 21.58% | -0.56% |
ISRA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISRA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.39% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRA and SCHG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISRA has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs 10.44% for ISRA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.
ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
ISRA is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.04% for SCHG.
ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer