ISHP vs. KNG
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISHP is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 2.04%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for KNG. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
ISHP vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 8.70% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- -8.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.29%
KNG
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 13.21%
- 3Y*
- 6.91%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.11K | $5.31K | $3.27K | |
| $17.95M | $15.66M | $14.57M |
ISHP vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -8.73% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -0.18% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.70% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -7.03% | 24.78% | 7.21% | 26.64% | -1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and KNG is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ISHP and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISHP vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
KNG
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
KNG
Communication Services
ISHP
KNG
-
Industrials
ISHP
KNG
Technology
ISHP
KNG
Real Estate
ISHP
KNG
Financial Services
ISHP
KNG
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
KNG
Healthcare
ISHP
KNG
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
KNG
Energy
ISHP
-
KNG
Utilities
ISHP
-
KNG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
KNG
ISHP vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISHP | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.20 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.47 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 3.70 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -35.12% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -8.61% | -16.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -14.24% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -18.20% | -29.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.15% | -2.12% | -14.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.76% | -4.09% | -8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.89% | 3.42% | +10.47% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 4.58%. This indicates that ISHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 4.58% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 8.36% | +6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 10.87% | +7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 13.65% | +13.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 17.12% | +6.91% |
ISHP vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than KNG's 8.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.27% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and KNG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISHP has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to KNG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs KNG's -35.12%.
On 5-year performance, KNG leads with 5.62% vs 2.04% for ISHP. On fees, ISHP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KNG has performed better with a 5.62% return vs 2.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISHP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 1.14% for ISHP.
ISHP is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while KNG is Dividend. ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.75% for KNG.
KNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer