ISCG vs. FSCDX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX).
ISCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. FSCDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 9, 1998.
Performance
ISCG vs. FSCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISCG vs. FSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | -1.05% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -1.26% | 43.41% | 27.66% | -6.91% | 24.68% |
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.63% | 11.85% | -2.52% | 18.29% | -20.70% | 31.22% | 17.13% | 32.31% | -16.38% | 13.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCG achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than FSCDX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCG has outperformed FSCDX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while FSCDX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.24% annualized return.
ISCG
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 22.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
FSCDX
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 22.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISCG vs. FSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FSCDX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ISCG vs. FSCDX — Risk / Return Rank
ISCG
FSCDX
ISCG vs. FSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCG | FSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.03 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.56 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.47 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 6.28 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCG | FSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.03 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.15 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.38 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.44 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCG and FSCDX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ISCG vs. FSCDX - Dividend Comparison
ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FSCDX's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.64% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A | 1.90% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 5.36% | 10.98% | 2.70% | 3.97% | 14.60% | 14.03% | 2.35% | 8.39% |
Drawdowns
ISCG vs. FSCDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCG drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, which is greater than FSCDX's maximum drawdown of -50.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCG and FSCDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCG | FSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.72% | -50.10% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.09% | -13.77% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.80% | -35.42% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -40.44% | -1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.39% | -10.27% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -11.69% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.21% | +0.29% |
Volatility
ISCG vs. FSCDX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) at 6.42%. This indicates that ISCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISCG | FSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 6.42% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.01% | 12.61% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.33% | 21.92% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 22.07% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 21.90% | +1.22% |