FSCDX vs. FCAGX

In the year-to-date period, FSCDX achieves a -6.12% return, which is significantly higher than FCAGX's -7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCDX has underperformed FCAGX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while FCAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.07% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FSCDX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FCAGX's 1.29% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FSCDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the FCAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCDX and FCAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.21%, more than FCAGX's 1.29% yield.

The maximum FSCDX drawdown since its inception was -49.89%, smaller than the maximum FCAGX drawdown of -59.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCDX and FCAGX.

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) have volatilities of 5.72% and 5.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.