ISCB vs. QQQS
ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) and QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ISCB tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index while QQQS tracks the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISCB returned 16.41%/yr vs 15.89%/yr for QQQS. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQQS.
Performance
ISCB vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 27.27% return.
ISCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
QQQS
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 27.27%
- 6M
- 27.40%
- 1Y
- 79.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCB vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 11.43% | 12.46% | 10.90% | 19.51% | 3.60% |
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 27.27% | 23.03% | 10.20% | -1.94% | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCB and QQQS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ISCB and QQQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISCB vs. QQQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISCB
QQQS
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Industrials
ISCB
QQQS
Financial Services
ISCB
QQQS
Technology
ISCB
QQQS
Healthcare
ISCB
QQQS
Consumer Cyclical
ISCB
QQQS
Real Estate
ISCB
QQQS
-
Energy
ISCB
QQQS
Basic Materials
ISCB
QQQS
Consumer Defensive
ISCB
QQQS
Communication Services
ISCB
QQQS
Utilities
ISCB
QQQS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCB vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank
ISCB
QQQS
ISCB vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCB | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 5.90 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.26 | 19.70 | -8.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCB | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 3.00 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.63 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
ISCB vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and QQQS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCB | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -38.06% | -23.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -13.63% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.22% | -34.32% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -2.55% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -13.26% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.07% | -1.44% |
Volatility
ISCB vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) is 4.28%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that ISCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCB | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 7.39% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 18.49% | -7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.51% | 26.90% | -10.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 28.34% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 28.34% | -5.66% |
ISCB vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISCB vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison
ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than QQQS's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 2.73% | 3.48% | 0.80% | 0.68% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISCB and QQQS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to ISCB (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs QQQS's -38.06%.
On 3-year performance, ISCB leads with 16.41% vs 15.89% for QQQS. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCB has performed better with a 16.41% return vs 15.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQQS.
QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.27% for ISCB.
ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.20% for QQQS.
QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCB and QQQS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer