IRBO vs. METV
IRBO (iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF) and METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRBO is a Robotics fund tracking the NYSE FactSet Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while METV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IRBO returned 36.54%/yr vs 23.94%/yr for METV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IRBO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for METV.
Performance
IRBO vs. METV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 66.09% return, which is significantly higher than METV's 1.54% return.
IRBO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 26.10%
- YTD
- 66.09%
- 6M
- 63.47%
- 1Y
- 112.42%
- 3Y*
- 36.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- —
METV
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRBO vs. METV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF | 66.09% | 29.97% | 8.02% | 36.37% | -37.89% | -5.83% |
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 1.54% | 30.83% | 24.93% | 60.57% | -52.66% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRBO and METV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IRBO and METV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IRBO vs. METV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IRBO
METV
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
IRBO
METV
Communication Services
IRBO
METV
Industrials
IRBO
METV
-
Utilities
IRBO
METV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IRBO
METV
Real Estate
IRBO
METV
-
Consumer Defensive
IRBO
METV
-
Healthcare
IRBO
METV
-
Basic Materials
IRBO
-
METV
-
Energy
IRBO
-
METV
-
Financial Services
IRBO
-
METV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRBO vs. METV — Risk / Return Rank
IRBO
METV
IRBO vs. METV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRBO | METV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.16 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.01 | 0.71 | +5.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.88 | 1.64 | +19.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRBO | METV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78 | 0.84 | +2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.16 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
IRBO vs. METV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, smaller than the maximum METV drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and METV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRBO | METV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.50% | -59.64% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.81% | -28.27% | +9.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.44% | -28.27% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -10.18% | +9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -26.00% | +6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | 12.29% | -6.89% |
Volatility
IRBO vs. METV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) at 5.70%. This indicates that IRBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRBO | METV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | 5.70% | +6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.12% | 17.67% | +7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.94% | 23.88% | +6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 29.96% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.75% | 29.96% | -2.21% |
IRBO vs. METV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than METV's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRBO vs. METV - Dividend Comparison
IRBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.88% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 0.53% | 0.69% | 0.34% |
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRBO and METV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRBO has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to METV (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBO dropped -54.50% vs METV's -59.64%.
On 3-year performance, IRBO leads with 36.54% vs 23.94% for METV. On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IRBO has performed better with a 36.54% return vs 23.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.
METV has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for IRBO.
IRBO is categorized as Robotics, while METV is Technology Equities. IRBO tracks NYSE FactSet Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.75% for METV.
IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRBO and METV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer