PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRBO vs. IBOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IRBO vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IRBO vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IRBO
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF
-3.42%29.97%8.02%15.21%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.97%28.57%6.39%18.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than IBOT's 0.97% return.


IRBO

1D
5.27%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
-3.42%
6M
1.64%
1Y
47.95%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*

IBOT

1D
4.22%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
0.97%
6M
6.86%
1Y
35.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IRBO vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IRBO and IBOT have an expense ratio of 0.47%.


Return for Risk

IRBO vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBO
IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IBOT
IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBO vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRBOIBOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

2.02

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.03

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.54

8.12

+0.42

IRBO vs. IBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRBO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the IBOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRBO and IBOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRBOIBOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.84

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between IRBO and IBOT is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IRBO vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

IRBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IRBO
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.38%0.38%2.81%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IRBO vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and IBOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IRBOIBOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

-25.39%

-29.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

-16.74%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.53%

-13.23%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.24%

-5.18%

-15.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

4.19%

+1.27%

Volatility

IRBO vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) has a higher volatility of 13.21% compared to VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) at 9.33%. This indicates that IRBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IRBOIBOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.21%

9.33%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.20%

16.61%

+6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.56%

25.61%

+6.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.89%

21.78%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

21.78%

+5.64%