PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSI vs. MNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSI vs. MNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSI achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than MNA's 2.21% return.


IQSI

1D
0.31%
1M
0.32%
6M
5.61%
YTD
11.22%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.55%

MNA

1D
0.16%
1M
0.41%
6M
1.39%
YTD
2.21%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
2.98%
ALL TIME*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$66.39K$361.19K$950.83K
$589.19K$1.51M$1.04M

IQSI vs. MNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
11.22%26.95%4.84%16.21%-14.76%12.70%10.36%0.38%
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
2.21%8.59%4.93%0.18%-1.61%-3.24%2.72%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSI and MNA is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSI vs. MNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IQSI
IQSI Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IQSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MNA
MNA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IQSI vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQSIMNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.40

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

5.72

+1.17

IQSI vs. MNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the MNA Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSI and MNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQSI vs. MNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSI drawdown since its inception was -31.90%, which is greater than MNA's maximum drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSI and MNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSIMNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.90%

-16.68%

-15.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-1.40%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-3.01%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.86%

-9.46%

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.19%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-2.81%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

0.58%

+2.68%

Volatility

IQSI vs. MNA - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) at 1.55%. This indicates that IQSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSIMNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

1.55%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

3.62%

+9.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

4.75%

+11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

4.98%

+11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

6.52%

+12.42%

IQSI vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSI vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison

IQSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
2.69%2.75%2.79%2.98%2.89%2.75%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.20%0.00%0.00%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSI and MNA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQSI has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to MNA (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSI dropped -31.90% vs MNA's -16.68%.

On 5-year performance, IQSI leads with 8.09% vs 2.29% for MNA. On fees, IQSI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MNA has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQSI has performed better with a 8.09% return vs 2.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for MNA.

IQSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for MNA.

IQSI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MNA is Event Driven. IQSI tracks IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index, while MNA tracks IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSI and 0.77% for MNA.

IQSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSI and MNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer