PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSI vs. IQDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSI vs. IQDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSI achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than IQDF's 16.57% return.


IQSI

1D
0.68%
1M
3.43%
YTD
9.57%
6M
12.22%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*

IQDF

1D
0.77%
1M
5.41%
YTD
16.57%
6M
20.00%
1Y
35.99%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
9.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSI vs. IQDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
9.57%26.95%4.84%16.21%-14.76%12.70%10.36%0.27%
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
16.57%35.42%6.62%20.10%-14.69%10.18%3.54%1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSI and IQDF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.91

The correlation between IQSI and IQDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQSI vs. IQDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSI
IQDF

Financial Services

22.2%
25.9%

Industrials

16.8%
13.2%

Technology

15.9%
15.6%

Healthcare

13.2%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
5.7%

Basic Materials

5.6%
8.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
4.9%

Utilities

4.0%
3.9%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.3%

Energy

0.9%
7.2%

Financial Services

IQSI
22.2%
IQDF
25.9%

Industrials

IQSI
16.8%
IQDF
13.2%

Technology

IQSI
15.9%
IQDF
15.6%

Healthcare

IQSI
13.2%
IQDF
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IQSI
7.6%
IQDF
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

IQSI
6.0%
IQDF
5.7%

Basic Materials

IQSI
5.6%
IQDF
8.3%

Communication Services

IQSI
4.1%
IQDF
4.9%

Utilities

IQSI
4.0%
IQDF
3.9%

Real Estate

IQSI
2.3%
IQDF
2.3%

Energy

IQSI
0.9%
IQDF
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSI vs. IQDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSI
IQSI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IQSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IQDF
IQDF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IQDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDF Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSI vs. IQDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSIIQDFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.51

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

3.36

-1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.72

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.05

14.45

-8.39

IQSI vs. IQDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the IQDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSI and IQDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSIIQDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.51

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.70

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.45

+0.06

Drawdowns

IQSI vs. IQDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSI drawdown since its inception was -31.90%, smaller than the maximum IQDF drawdown of -39.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSI and IQDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSIIQDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.90%

-39.83%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-10.03%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-13.92%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.86%

-30.34%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

0.00%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-9.34%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

2.58%

+0.69%

Volatility

IQSI vs. IQDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) is 5.14%, while FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that IQSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSIIQDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

5.58%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

12.18%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

14.42%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

15.49%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

16.63%

+2.38%

IQSI vs. IQDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IQDF's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSI vs. IQDF - Dividend Comparison

IQSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than IQDF's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
2.75%3.27%6.72%6.06%5.59%4.13%3.31%4.46%5.78%3.89%3.75%4.27%
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
2.49%2.75%2.79%2.98%2.89%2.75%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IQSI and IQDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IQDF has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to IQSI (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSI dropped -31.90% vs IQDF's -39.83%.

On 5-year performance, IQDF leads with 10.83% vs 7.94% for IQSI. On fees, IQSI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IQSI has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQDF has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDF.

IQDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.49% for IQSI.

IQSI tracks IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index, while IQDF tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSI and 0.47% for IQDF.

IQDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSI and IQDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer