IPSC vs. AMAL

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IPSC (Century Therapeutics, Inc.) and AMAL (Amalgamated Financial Corp.) are both stocks. IPSC operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while AMAL operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, IPSC returned -41.37%/yr vs 28.65%/yr for AMAL. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

IPSC vs. AMAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC) and Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPSC achieves a 103.06% return, which is significantly higher than AMAL's 55.47% return.

IPSC

• 1D: -7.76%
• 1M: -16.87%
• 6M: 6.32%
• YTD: 103.06%
• 1Y: 279.77%
• 3Y*: -12.55%
• 5Y*: -41.37%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.80%

AMAL

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 7.25%
• 6M: 28.21%
• YTD: 55.47%
• 1Y: 76.42%
• 3Y*: 38.78%
• 5Y*: 28.65%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMAL Amalgamated Financial Corp.	$8.33M	$7.67M	$6.82M
IPSC Century Therapeutics, Inc.	$1.42M	$2.12M	$2.88M

IPSC vs. AMAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IPSC Century Therapeutics, Inc.	103.06%	-1.50%	-69.58%	-35.28%	-67.65%	-18.67%
AMAL Amalgamated Financial Corp.	55.47%	-2.50%	26.32%	19.44%	39.78%	9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IPSC and AMAL is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021	0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap IPSC : $174.87M AMAL : $1.47B
EPS IPSC : -$0.88 AMAL : $3.75
PB Ratio IPSC : 1.48 AMAL : 1.79
Total Revenue (TTM) IPSC : $0.00 AMAL : $485.42M
Gross Profit (TTM) IPSC : -$9.88M AMAL : $338.80M
EBITDA (TTM) IPSC : -$103.02M AMAL : $156.66M

Return for Risk

IPSC vs. AMAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPSC

IPSC Risk / Return Rank: 96
IPSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IPSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
IPSC Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IPSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IPSC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

AMAL

AMAL Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AMAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AMAL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AMAL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPSC vs. AMAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC) and Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPSC	AMAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.48	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	3.25	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.39	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.32	4.64	+2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.90	13.36	+1.54

IPSC vs. AMAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the AMAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPSC and AMAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPSC vs. AMAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPSC drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than AMAL's maximum drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPSC and AMAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPSC	AMAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.78%	-62.93%	-35.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.98%	-15.91%	-21.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.68%	-32.85%	-59.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.78%	-46.88%	-51.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.67%	-1.02%	-92.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.81%	-19.60%	-61.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.14%	5.53%	+12.61%

Volatility

IPSC vs. AMAL - Volatility Comparison

Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC) has a higher volatility of 16.98% compared to Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) at 7.43%. This indicates that IPSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPSC	AMAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.98%	7.43%	+9.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.48%	19.05%	+32.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	97.17%	29.77%	+67.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.40%	33.86%	+49.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.64%	39.78%	+43.86%

Dividends

IPSC vs. AMAL - Dividend Comparison

IPSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AMAL Amalgamated Financial Corp.	1.26%	1.75%	1.37%	1.48%	1.56%	1.91%	2.33%	1.34%	0.31%
IPSC Century Therapeutics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPSC and AMAL in my portfolio?

IPSC and AMAL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPSC or AMAL?

IPSC has higher volatility (16.98%) compared to AMAL (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPSC dropped -98.78% vs AMAL's -62.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.