AMAL vs. BKDV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV).

BKDV is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Nov 1, 2024.

Performance

AMAL vs. BKDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMAL vs. BKDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMAL Amalgamated Financial Corp.	21.87%	-2.50%	1.89%
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	2.21%	18.58%	-0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAL achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly higher than BKDV's 2.21% return.

AMAL

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 21.87%
• 6M: 44.51%
• 1Y: 37.79%
• 3Y*: 32.47%
• 5Y*: 20.13%
• 10Y*: —

BKDV

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: -4.11%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 6M: 7.34%
• 1Y: 18.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMAL vs. BKDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAL

AMAL Risk / Return Rank: 74
AMAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AMAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
AMAL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
AMAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AMAL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BKDV

BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 61
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAL vs. BKDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMAL	BKDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.07	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.53	+0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.23	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	1.58	-0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	6.97	-3.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMAL vs. BKDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the BKDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAL and BKDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMAL	BKDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.07	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.88	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between AMAL and BKDV is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMAL vs. BKDV - Dividend Comparison

AMAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than BKDV's 0.60% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AMAL Amalgamated Financial Corp.	1.52%	1.75%	1.37%	1.48%	1.56%	1.91%	2.33%	1.34%	0.31%
BKDV BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF	0.60%	0.62%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAL vs. BKDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAL drawdown since its inception was -62.93%, which is greater than BKDV's maximum drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAL and BKDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAL	BKDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.93%	-15.49%	-47.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.41%	-12.07%	-12.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.25%	-4.69%	-2.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.34%	-2.59%	-17.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.45%	2.74%	+7.71%

Volatility

AMAL vs. BKDV - Volatility Comparison

Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) at 4.62%. This indicates that AMAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMAL	BKDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	4.62%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.47%	9.09%	+13.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.92%	16.88%	+15.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.82%	16.05%	+17.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.24%	16.05%	+24.19%