PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAL vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAL vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAL achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 20.46% return.


AMAL

1D
0.67%
1M
7.17%
YTD
39.32%
6M
35.93%
1Y
50.24%
3Y*
43.01%
5Y*
26.10%
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.98%
YTD
20.46%
6M
19.51%
1Y
41.06%
3Y*
27.57%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAL vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AMAL
Amalgamated Financial Corp.
39.32%-2.50%26.32%19.44%39.78%24.43%11.92%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
20.46%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAL and QQQM is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAL vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAL
AMAL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AMAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAL vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMALQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.45

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

12.82

-7.96

AMAL vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAL and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMAL vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAL drawdown since its inception was -62.93%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAL and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMALQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.93%

-35.04%

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-11.96%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-22.70%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.88%

-35.04%

-11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.97%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.86%

-8.20%

-11.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.37%

3.21%

+7.16%

Volatility

AMAL vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 8.02% and 8.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMALQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

8.28%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.18%

14.05%

+7.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.89%

17.55%

+13.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.79%

22.48%

+11.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.94%

22.26%

+17.68%

Dividends

AMAL vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

AMAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMAL
Amalgamated Financial Corp.
1.40%1.75%1.37%1.48%1.56%1.91%2.33%1.34%0.31%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAL and QQQM have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to AMAL (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAL dropped -62.93% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAL and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer