PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAL vs. BCSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMAL vs. BCSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAL achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than BCSF's -6.30% return.


AMAL

1D
0.67%
1M
7.17%
YTD
39.32%
6M
35.93%
1Y
50.24%
3Y*
43.01%
5Y*
26.10%
10Y*

BCSF

1D
-1.54%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-6.30%
6M
-3.97%
1Y
-6.04%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAL vs. BCSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AMAL
Amalgamated Financial Corp.
39.32%-2.50%26.32%19.44%39.78%24.43%-27.56%1.22%-1.32%
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.
-6.30%-9.60%29.52%41.95%-13.31%36.98%-28.91%28.19%-4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAL and BCSF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMAL:

$1.33B

BCSF:

$790.10M

EPS

AMAL:

$3.44

BCSF:

$1.50

PE Ratio

AMAL:

12.85

BCSF:

8.10

PS Ratio

AMAL:

2.87

BCSF:

3.33

PB Ratio

AMAL:

1.65

BCSF:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMAL:

$468.02M

BCSF:

$237.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMAL:

$320.86M

BCSF:

$150.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMAL:

$143.89M

BCSF:

-$29.62M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAL vs. BCSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAL
AMAL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AMAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BCSF
BCSF Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BCSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAL vs. BCSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMALBCSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.97

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

-0.37

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

-0.76

+5.61

AMAL vs. BCSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the BCSF Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAL and BCSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMAL vs. BCSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAL drawdown since its inception was -62.93%, roughly equal to the maximum BCSF drawdown of -62.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAL and BCSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMALBCSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.93%

-62.42%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-16.17%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-26.38%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.88%

-26.38%

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-22.18%

+21.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.86%

-12.31%

-7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.37%

8.01%

+2.36%

Volatility

AMAL vs. BCSF - Volatility Comparison

Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) at 7.28%. This indicates that AMAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMALBCSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

7.28%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.18%

18.00%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.89%

21.93%

+8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.79%

20.36%

+13.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.94%

30.97%

+8.97%

Dividends

AMAL vs. BCSF - Dividend Comparison

AMAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than BCSF's 15.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMAL
Amalgamated Financial Corp.
1.40%1.75%1.37%1.48%1.56%1.91%2.33%1.34%0.31%
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.
15.52%14.02%10.27%10.62%11.60%8.94%11.73%8.30%2.44%

Financials

AMAL vs. BCSF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amalgamated Financial Corp. and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M20222023202420252026
122.60M
50.13M
(AMAL) Total Revenue
(BCSF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMAL vs. BCSF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amalgamated Financial Corp. and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
65.2%
0
Portfolio components
AMAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amalgamated Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 79.95M and revenue of 122.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.2%.

BCSF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 50.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AMAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amalgamated Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 34.07M and revenue of 122.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

BCSF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 50.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AMAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amalgamated Financial Corp. reported a net income of 25.22M and revenue of 122.60M, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.

BCSF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported a net income of 27.36M and revenue of 50.13M, resulting in a net margin of 54.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMAL and BCSF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAL has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to BCSF (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAL dropped -62.93% vs BCSF's -62.42%.

AMAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAL and BCSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer