PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAL vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMAL vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMAL vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AMAL
Amalgamated Financial Corp.
21.87%-2.50%26.32%19.44%39.78%24.43%-27.56%-2.16%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
-5.55%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAL achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly higher than SPUS's -5.55% return.


AMAL

1D
1.65%
1M
0.99%
YTD
21.87%
6M
44.51%
1Y
37.79%
3Y*
32.47%
5Y*
20.13%
10Y*

SPUS

1D
3.24%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAL vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAL
AMAL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AMAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAL vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMALSPUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.80

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.96

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.64

8.40

-4.76

AMAL vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAL and SPUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMALSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.72

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.75

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between AMAL and SPUS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AMAL vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

AMAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than SPUS's 0.63% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMAL
Amalgamated Financial Corp.
1.52%1.75%1.37%1.48%1.56%1.91%2.33%1.34%0.31%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.63%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAL vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAL drawdown since its inception was -62.93%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAL and SPUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMALSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.93%

-30.80%

-32.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-12.76%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.88%

-28.06%

-18.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.25%

-7.77%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.34%

-6.35%

-13.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.45%

2.98%

+7.47%

Volatility

AMAL vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) is 5.58%, while SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that AMAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMALSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

6.04%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.47%

11.25%

+11.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

20.90%

+11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.82%

19.20%

+14.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.24%

21.43%

+18.81%