IPRP.L vs. ET
IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) is REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while ET (Energy Transfer LP) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L returned 1.88%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for ET. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IPRP.L vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IPRP.L is traded in GBp, while ET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ET values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 20.46% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 1.88%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.72% annualized return.
IPRP.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 2.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- -4.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
ET
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 20.46%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 13.54%
- 3Y*
- 21.54%
- 5Y*
- 21.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
IPRP.L vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.47% | 13.63% | -4.96% | 15.42% | -33.74% | 1.88% | -3.84% | 18.45% | -5.36% | 19.14% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 20.46% | -15.82% | 56.56% | 21.48% | 74.26% | 44.32% | -46.54% | 1.85% | -12.87% | -12.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPRP.L and ET is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2007 | 0.16 |
The correlation between IPRP.L and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPRP.L vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
IPRP.L
ET
IPRP.L vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPRP.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.14 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 1.46 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 3.13 | -2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPRP.L vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -64.48%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -86.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPRP.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.48% | -86.84% | +22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.12% | -9.03% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.12% | -29.54% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -29.54% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.77% | -71.58% | +22.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.83% | -6.88% | -16.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -21.63% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 4.23% | +2.05% |
Volatility
IPRP.L vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) is 4.23%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that IPRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPRP.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 5.60% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 13.30% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 17.61% | -2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 24.56% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 34.84% | -15.49% |
Dividends
IPRP.L vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than ET's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.00% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.50% | 2.83% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 4.20% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.24% | 2.81% | 2.49% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPRP.L and ET have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer