IPOS vs. VEA
IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index while VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPOS returned 3.00%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for VEA. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPOS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
IPOS vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 40.15% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOS has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 3.00%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.
IPOS
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 40.15%
- 6M
- 44.26%
- 1Y
- 65.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
IPOS vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 40.15% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPOS and VEA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014 | 0.54 |
The correlation between IPOS and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IPOS vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPOS
VEA
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
IPOS
VEA
Healthcare
IPOS
VEA
Industrials
IPOS
VEA
Financial Services
IPOS
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
IPOS
VEA
Basic Materials
IPOS
VEA
Energy
IPOS
VEA
Consumer Defensive
IPOS
VEA
Utilities
IPOS
VEA
Communication Services
IPOS
VEA
Real Estate
IPOS
-
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPOS vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
IPOS
VEA
IPOS vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPOS | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.38 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 2.81 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 10.94 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPOS | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.09 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.58 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.59 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.25 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
IPOS vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPOS | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.09% | -60.68% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.17% | -11.63% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.08% | -13.45% | -20.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -29.71% | -40.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.09% | -35.73% | -37.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.44% | -0.90% | -39.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.99% | -13.29% | -18.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 2.98% | +2.69% |
Volatility
IPOS vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 5.66%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPOS | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 5.66% | +6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.45% | 13.32% | +13.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.41% | 15.66% | +13.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 16.55% | +10.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 17.36% | +6.77% |
IPOS vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPOS vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.68% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPOS and VEA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to VEA (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.17% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.
IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.03% for VEA.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPOS and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer