PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPOS vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPOS vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 40.15% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOS has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 3.00%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.


IPOS

1D
0.43%
1M
10.58%
YTD
40.15%
6M
44.26%
1Y
65.50%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
-7.69%
10Y*
3.00%

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPOS vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
40.15%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%36.83%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOS and VEA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014

0.54

The correlation between IPOS and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPOS vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPOS
VEA

Technology

42.0%
13.8%

Healthcare

16.2%
8.2%

Industrials

15.0%
19.2%

Financial Services

9.6%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
7.5%

Basic Materials

5.3%
7.5%

Energy

4.9%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.6%

Utilities

3.1%
3.3%

Communication Services

0.3%
3.4%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Technology

IPOS
42.0%
VEA
13.8%

Healthcare

IPOS
16.2%
VEA
8.2%

Industrials

IPOS
15.0%
VEA
19.2%

Financial Services

IPOS
9.6%
VEA
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IPOS
7.1%
VEA
7.5%

Basic Materials

IPOS
5.3%
VEA
7.5%

Energy

IPOS
4.9%
VEA
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

IPOS
4.7%
VEA
5.6%

Utilities

IPOS
3.1%
VEA
3.3%

Communication Services

IPOS
0.3%
VEA
3.4%

Real Estate

IPOS

-

VEA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPOS vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPOS vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPOSVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

2.81

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

10.94

+0.64

IPOS vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOS Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOS and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPOSVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.09

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.58

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.59

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.25

-0.16

Drawdowns

IPOS vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOSVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.09%

-60.68%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-11.63%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

-13.45%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.93%

-29.71%

-40.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.09%

-35.73%

-37.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.44%

-0.90%

-39.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.99%

-13.29%

-18.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

2.98%

+2.69%

Volatility

IPOS vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 5.66%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOSVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.05%

5.66%

+6.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.45%

13.32%

+13.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

15.66%

+13.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.19%

16.55%

+10.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

17.36%

+6.77%

IPOS vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPOS vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.68%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPOS and VEA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to VEA (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.17% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.

IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.03% for VEA.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPOS and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer