IPOS vs. EIS
IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) and EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index while EIS tracks the MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPOS returned 3.00%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for EIS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPOS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EIS.
Performance
IPOS vs. EIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 40.15% return, which is significantly higher than EIS's 18.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOS has underperformed EIS with an annualized return of 3.00%, while EIS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.
IPOS
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 40.15%
- 6M
- 44.26%
- 1Y
- 65.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
EIS
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 6M
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 54.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
IPOS vs. EIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 40.15% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 18.19% | 45.11% | 34.50% | 5.48% | -27.05% | 22.83% | 12.01% | 20.93% | -4.84% | 12.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPOS and EIS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014 | 0.40 |
The correlation between IPOS and EIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IPOS vs. EIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPOS
EIS
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
IPOS
EIS
Healthcare
IPOS
EIS
Industrials
IPOS
EIS
Financial Services
IPOS
EIS
Consumer Cyclical
IPOS
EIS
Basic Materials
IPOS
EIS
Energy
IPOS
EIS
Consumer Defensive
IPOS
EIS
Utilities
IPOS
EIS
Communication Services
IPOS
EIS
Real Estate
IPOS
-
EIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPOS vs. EIS — Risk / Return Rank
IPOS
EIS
IPOS vs. EIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPOS | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 4.45 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 16.54 | -4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPOS | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.45 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.71 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.57 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.33 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
IPOS vs. EIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than EIS's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and EIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPOS | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.09% | -51.94% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.17% | -12.40% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.08% | -24.10% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -41.88% | -28.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.09% | -41.88% | -31.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.44% | -5.56% | -34.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.99% | -13.90% | -18.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 3.33% | +2.34% |
Volatility
IPOS vs. EIS - Volatility Comparison
Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) at 6.64%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPOS | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 6.64% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.45% | 16.05% | +10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.41% | 22.56% | +6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 21.81% | +5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 21.08% | +3.05% |
IPOS vs. EIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EIS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPOS vs. EIS - Dividend Comparison
IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than EIS's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.68% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPOS and EIS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to EIS (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs EIS's -51.94%.
On 10-year performance, EIS leads with 11.97% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, EIS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EIS has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
EIS has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.
IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.59% for EIS.
EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPOS and EIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer