PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPO vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPO vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 11.10%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.21% annualized return.


IPO

1D
-0.28%
1M
10.70%
YTD
24.27%
6M
21.48%
1Y
30.62%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
-1.34%
10Y*
11.10%

VOT

1D
0.69%
1M
5.16%
YTD
9.14%
6M
6.88%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
12.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPO vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
24.27%5.45%15.68%52.55%-57.26%-10.31%107.88%34.11%-17.24%37.16%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
9.14%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IPO and VOT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.81

The correlation between IPO and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPO vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPO
VOT

Technology

40.3%
28.9%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
13.9%

Healthcare

10.8%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
0.8%

Industrials

9.1%
23.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
3.8%

Financial Services

4.3%
6.8%

Real Estate

4.0%
4.8%

Energy

1.1%
2.7%

Utilities

0.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Technology

IPO
40.3%
VOT
28.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IPO
14.4%
VOT
13.9%

Healthcare

IPO
10.8%
VOT
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

IPO
9.2%
VOT
0.8%

Industrials

IPO
9.1%
VOT
23.7%

Communication Services

IPO
6.6%
VOT
3.8%

Financial Services

IPO
4.3%
VOT
6.8%

Real Estate

IPO
4.0%
VOT
4.8%

Energy

IPO
1.1%
VOT
2.7%

Utilities

IPO
0.3%
VOT
3.5%

Basic Materials

IPO

-

VOT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPO vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPO
IPO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPO vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPOVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

0.77

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

2.31

+0.32

IPO vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPO Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPO and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPOVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.78

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.33

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.58

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.45

-0.15

Drawdowns

IPO vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than VOT's maximum drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.76%

-60.16%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.24%

-15.96%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.04%

-21.77%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

-37.19%

-28.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.76%

-37.19%

-31.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-0.14%

-24.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-9.96%

-12.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.67%

5.32%

+6.35%

Volatility

IPO vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 4.30%. This indicates that IPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.57%

4.30%

+5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.24%

12.37%

+9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.91%

15.79%

+13.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.84%

21.35%

+14.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.49%

20.98%

+10.51%

IPO vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPO vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than VOT's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
0.46%0.66%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.26%0.49%0.43%0.40%0.11%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPO and VOT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPO has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to VOT (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs VOT's -60.16%.

On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.21% vs 11.10% for IPO. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.21% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.46% for IPO.

IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.05% for VOT.

IPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPO and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer