IPAY vs. GXPT
IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IPAY tracks the Prime Mobile Payments Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
IPAY vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -16.12% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 16.86% return.
IPAY
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- -16.12%
- 6M
- -17.27%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- 2.21%
- 5Y*
- -9.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPAY vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -16.12% | -13.36% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAY and GXPT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAY vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
IPAY
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IPAY vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPAY | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPAY vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAY | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -18.74% | -33.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.27% | -8.72% | -30.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.77% | -5.04% | -11.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.46% | — | — |
Volatility
IPAY vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAY | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.92% | 22.91% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 22.91% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 22.91% | +2.48% |
IPAY vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPAY vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than GXPT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.94% | 0.79% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAY and GXPT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPAY.
IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.
IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPAY and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for IPAY and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer