IPAY vs. GXPT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IPAY tracks the Prime Mobile Payments Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IPAY returned -9.51% vs 30.95% for GXPT. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IPAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.

Performance

IPAY vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 17.60% return.

IPAY

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 4.88%
• 6M: 3.61%
• YTD: -2.46%
• 1Y: -9.51%
• 3Y*: 6.01%
• 5Y*: -5.73%
• 10Y*: 7.66%
• ALL TIME*: 6.67%

GXPT

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: 19.51%
• YTD: 17.60%
• 1Y: 30.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	$16.90M	$9.50M	$5.80M
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	$3.69M	$3.96M	$2.49M

IPAY vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-2.46%	-13.36%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	17.60%	11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and GXPT is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

IPAY vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 7
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

GXPT

GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 45
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPAY vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPAY	GXPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	1.32	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.37	1.87	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.23	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	1.66	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.52	4.35	-4.88

IPAY vs. GXPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the GXPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAY and GXPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPAY vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and GXPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAY	GXPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.75%	-18.74%	-33.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.88%	-18.74%	-12.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.38%	-8.14%	-21.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-5.46%	-11.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.21%	7.13%	+11.08%

Volatility

IPAY vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 7.11%, while Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAY	GXPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.11%	7.76%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.94%	19.32%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.73%	23.53%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.33%	23.28%	+3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	23.28%	+2.15%

IPAY vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPAY vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than GXPT's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.22%	0.14%	0.00%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.81%	0.79%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAY and GXPT in my portfolio?

IPAY and GXPT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPAY or GXPT?

GXPT has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to IPAY (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs GXPT's -18.74%.

Which ETF is better, IPAY or GXPT?

On 1-year performance, GXPT leads with 30.95% vs -9.51% for IPAY. On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAY or GXPT?

Over the 1-year period, GXPT has performed better with a 30.95% return vs -9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAY or GXPT?

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAY or GXPT?

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.22% for GXPT.

What is the main difference between IPAY and GXPT?

IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPAY and 0.15% for GXPT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GXPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.