PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTF vs. FCTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTF vs. FCTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly lower than FCTR's 14.51% return.


INTF

1D
0.17%
1M
1.66%
YTD
11.30%
6M
11.62%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
10.08%

FCTR

1D
0.70%
1M
4.17%
YTD
14.51%
6M
12.39%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTF vs. FCTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
11.30%35.50%5.99%18.25%-12.31%11.70%2.83%18.46%-15.52%
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
14.51%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.50%

Correlation

The correlation between INTF and FCTR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.71

The correlation between INTF and FCTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

INTF vs. FCTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INTF
FCTR

Financial Services

26.5%
8.5%

Industrials

19.0%
18.5%

Technology

9.9%
36.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
7.9%

Healthcare

7.9%
6.7%

Basic Materials

6.8%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
4.3%

Energy

5.1%
4.7%

Utilities

3.9%
2.7%

Communication Services

3.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.6%

Financial Services

INTF
26.5%
FCTR
8.5%

Industrials

INTF
19.0%
FCTR
18.5%

Technology

INTF
9.9%
FCTR
36.5%

Consumer Cyclical

INTF
8.5%
FCTR
7.9%

Healthcare

INTF
7.9%
FCTR
6.7%

Basic Materials

INTF
6.8%
FCTR
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

INTF
6.0%
FCTR
4.3%

Energy

INTF
5.1%
FCTR
4.7%

Utilities

INTF
3.9%
FCTR
2.7%

Communication Services

INTF
3.2%
FCTR
2.9%

Real Estate

INTF
2.5%
FCTR
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTF vs. FCTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTF
INTF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTF vs. FCTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTFFCTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.23

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

8.05

+3.30

INTF vs. FCTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the FCTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTF and FCTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTF vs. FCTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, which is greater than FCTR's maximum drawdown of -37.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and FCTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTFFCTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.39%

-37.10%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-11.17%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.64%

-22.63%

+8.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.26%

-37.10%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.32%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-10.34%

+2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.09%

-0.52%

Volatility

INTF vs. FCTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) is 4.31%, while First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that INTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTFFCTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

6.80%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

12.53%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

18.31%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

19.78%

-3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

21.96%

-4.68%

INTF vs. FCTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTF vs. FCTR - Dividend Comparison

INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than FCTR's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.35%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
3.01%2.87%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.26%1.66%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


INTF and FCTR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTR has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to INTF (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTF dropped -40.39% vs FCTR's -37.10%.

On 5-year performance, INTF leads with 10.44% vs 4.34% for FCTR. On fees, INTF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, INTF has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INTF has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INTF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.

INTF has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.35% for FCTR.

INTF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FCTR is Large Cap Growth Equities. INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INTF and 0.65% for FCTR.

INTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTF and FCTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer