INTF vs. FCTR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

INTF (iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF) and FCTR (First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while FCTR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INTF returned 9.90%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for FCTR. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INTF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FCTR.

Performance

INTF vs. FCTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than FCTR's 16.04% return.

INTF

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 6M: 14.13%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: 9.25%

FCTR

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: 9.12%
• YTD: 16.04%
• 6M: 17.40%
• 1Y: 24.59%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTF vs. FCTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF	10.41%	35.50%	5.99%	18.25%	-12.31%	11.70%	2.83%	18.46%	-15.25%
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	16.04%	8.63%	19.54%	0.71%	-20.42%	21.13%	30.17%	30.91%	-12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between INTF and FCTR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018	0.71

The correlation between INTF and FCTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INTF vs. FCTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INTF	FCTR
Financial Services	25.2%	18.7%
Industrials	19.1%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	8.5%
Technology	8.5%	19.3%
Healthcare	8.2%	9.4%
Basic Materials	6.6%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	8.1%
Energy	5.9%	6.5%
Utilities	4.7%	4.3%
Communication Services	3.9%	3.5%
Real Estate	2.7%	7.8%

Return for Risk

INTF vs. FCTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTF

INTF Risk / Return Rank: 52
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FCTR

FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 41
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTF vs. FCTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INTF	FCTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.41	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.95	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.25	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	2.23	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.44	8.18	+2.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INTF vs. FCTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FCTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTF and FCTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INTF	FCTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	1.41	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.23	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.47	-0.02

Drawdowns

INTF vs. FCTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, which is greater than FCTR's maximum drawdown of -37.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and FCTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTF	FCTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.39%	-37.10%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.20%	-11.17%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.64%	-22.63%	+8.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.26%	-37.10%	+7.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.70%	-10.40%	+2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	3.05%	-0.48%

Volatility

INTF vs. FCTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) is 4.65%, while First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that INTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INTF	FCTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	6.76%	-2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	11.84%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	17.51%	-2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	19.64%	-3.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	21.95%	-4.60%

INTF vs. FCTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

INTF vs. FCTR - Dividend Comparison

INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than FCTR's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	0.35%	0.30%	0.82%	1.04%	1.38%	0.46%	0.44%	0.98%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF	2.60%	2.87%	3.53%	3.59%	2.81%	5.38%	2.06%	3.65%	2.62%	3.26%	1.66%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INTF and FCTR in my portfolio?

INTF and FCTR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INTF or FCTR?

FCTR has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to INTF (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTF dropped -40.39% vs FCTR's -37.10%.

Which ETF is better, INTF or FCTR?

On 5-year performance, INTF leads with 9.90% vs 4.54% for FCTR. On fees, INTF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, INTF has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INTF or FCTR?

Over the 5-year period, INTF has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INTF or FCTR?

INTF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INTF or FCTR?

INTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.35% for FCTR.

What is the main difference between INTF and FCTR?

INTF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FCTR is Large Cap Growth Equities. INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INTF and 0.65% for FCTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.