INTA vs. EAT
INTA (Intapp, Inc.) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. INTA operates in Software - Application (Technology), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, INTA returned -20.80%/yr vs 62.12%/yr for EAT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INTA vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTA achieves a -47.84% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 11.01% return.
INTA
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- 14.90%
- YTD
- -47.84%
- 6M
- -44.39%
- 1Y
- -55.30%
- 3Y*
- -20.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 16.50%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
INTA vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTA Intapp, Inc. | -47.84% | -28.51% | 68.57% | 52.45% | -0.87% | -0.36% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -39.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTA and EAT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between INTA and EAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INTA:
$1.89B
EAT:
$7.09B
INTA:
-$0.48
EAT:
$10.14
INTA:
3.45
EAT:
1.27
INTA:
5.89
EAT:
17.46
INTA:
$554.34M
EAT:
$5.73B
INTA:
$415.89M
EAT:
$3.45B
INTA:
-$30.20M
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTA vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
INTA
EAT
INTA vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTA | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.00 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.22 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | -0.44 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTA vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTA drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTA and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTA | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.17% | -88.40% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.89% | -44.41% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.17% | -45.92% | -28.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -65.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.75% | -15.77% | -51.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -24.33% | -6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.95% | 21.77% | +18.18% |
Volatility
INTA vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
Intapp, Inc. (INTA) has a higher volatility of 21.29% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 15.23%. This indicates that INTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTA | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.29% | 15.23% | +6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.58% | 36.27% | +11.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.97% | 46.95% | +9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.69% | 49.04% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.69% | 55.13% | -0.44% |
Dividends
INTA vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither INTA nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
INTA Intapp, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
INTA vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intapp, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INTA vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
INTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.51M and revenue of 146.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.7%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
INTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported an operating income of -14.25M and revenue of 146.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -9.8%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
INTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported a net income of -15.50M and revenue of 146.04M, resulting in a net margin of -10.6%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTA and EAT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTA has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to EAT (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTA dropped -74.17% vs EAT's -88.40%.
EAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTA and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer