PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTA vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTA vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTA achieves a -47.77% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 255.40% return.


INTA

1D
-4.59%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-47.77%
6M
-47.03%
1Y
-57.30%
3Y*
-16.85%
5Y*
10Y*

MRVL

1D
3.73%
1M
84.32%
YTD
255.40%
6M
201.42%
1Y
385.03%
3Y*
71.71%
5Y*
44.57%
10Y*
41.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTA vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
INTA
Intapp, Inc.
-47.77%-28.51%68.57%52.45%-0.87%-10.14%
MRVL
Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
255.40%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%50.29%

Correlation

The correlation between INTA and MRVL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between INTA and MRVL has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INTA:

$1.89B

MRVL:

$269.46B

EPS

INTA:

-$0.48

MRVL:

$2.90

PS Ratio

INTA:

3.45

MRVL:

30.19

PB Ratio

INTA:

5.89

MRVL:

14.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTA:

$554.34M

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTA:

$415.89M

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

INTA:

-$30.20M

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTA vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTA
INTA Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
INTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
INTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTA Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTA vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTAMRVLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.03

5.80

-6.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.75

5.06

-6.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.67

-0.87

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

14.72

-15.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.40

34.27

-35.67

INTA vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTA Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 5.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTA and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTAMRVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.03

5.80

-6.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.23

-0.29

Drawdowns

INTA vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTA drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTA and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTAMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.17%

-91.60%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.17%

-26.36%

-40.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.17%

-60.79%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.71%

0.00%

-67.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-46.78%

+15.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.94%

11.30%

+29.64%

Volatility

INTA vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intapp, Inc. (INTA) is 23.68%, while Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL) has a volatility of 32.78%. This indicates that INTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTAMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.68%

32.78%

-9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.69%

50.48%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.89%

66.88%

-10.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.61%

60.92%

-6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.61%

51.38%

+3.23%

Dividends

INTA vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

INTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTA
Intapp, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
0.08%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

INTA vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intapp, Inc. and Marvell Technology Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
146.04M
2.42B
(INTA) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INTA vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intapp, Inc. and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
75.7%
52.2%
Portfolio components
INTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.51M and revenue of 146.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.7%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

INTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported an operating income of -14.25M and revenue of 146.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -9.8%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

INTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported a net income of -15.50M and revenue of 146.04M, resulting in a net margin of -10.6%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INTA and MRVL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (32.78%) compared to INTA (23.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTA dropped -74.17% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.80 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTA and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer