PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
INTA vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between INTA and QYLD is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

INTA vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 1, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).

QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INTA or QYLD.

Performance

INTA vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

INTA:

1.04

QYLD:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

INTA:

1.76

QYLD:

0.56

Omega Ratio

INTA:

1.22

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

INTA:

1.45

QYLD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

INTA:

3.94

QYLD:

1.01

Ulcer Index

INTA:

12.90%

QYLD:

5.60%

Daily Std Dev

INTA:

47.27%

QYLD:

19.16%

Max Drawdown

INTA:

-65.72%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

INTA:

-25.61%

QYLD:

-9.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTA achieves a -14.00% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's -5.59% return.

INTA

YTD

-14.00%

1M

-0.58%

6M

-11.88%

1Y

53.54%

3Y*

40.49%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QYLD

YTD

-5.59%

1M

1.26%

6M

-3.85%

1Y

6.20%

3Y*

9.43%

5Y*

7.91%

10Y*

7.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Intapp, Inc.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

INTA vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
INTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INTA is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INTA is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INTA is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INTA is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INTA is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INTA is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

INTA vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current INTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTA and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

INTA vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

INTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
INTA
Intapp, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF		13.78%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

INTA vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTA drawdown since its inception was -65.72%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTA and QYLD.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

INTA vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Intapp, Inc. (INTA) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.90%. This indicates that INTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...