INSW vs. STM
INSW (International Seaways, Inc.) and STM (STMicroelectronics N.V.) are both stocks. INSW operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while STM operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, INSW returned 51.47%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for STM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INSW vs. STM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INSW achieves a 98.85% return, which is significantly lower than STM's 176.58% return.
INSW
- 1D
- 6.63%
- 1M
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 77.43%
- YTD
- 98.85%
- 1Y
- 149.26%
- 3Y*
- 48.58%
- 5Y*
- 51.47%
- 10Y*
- —
STM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -8.42%
- 6M
- 148.77%
- YTD
- 176.58%
- 1Y
- 123.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 29.42%
INSW vs. STM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 98.85% | 44.97% | -10.85% | 42.93% | 162.53% | -2.93% | -44.43% | 76.72% | -8.78% | 31.48% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 176.58% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between INSW and STM is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
INSW:
$4.38B
STM:
$63.77B
INSW:
$11.00
STM:
$0.15
INSW:
8.05
STM:
468.06
INSW:
6.50
STM:
5.46
INSW:
2.00
STM:
3.72
INSW:
$675.87M
STM:
$12.40B
INSW:
$274.33M
STM:
$4.20B
INSW:
$525.75M
STM:
$2.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INSW vs. STM — Risk / Return Rank
INSW
STM
INSW vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INSW | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.36 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.38 | 3.26 | +6.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.88 | 7.35 | +18.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INSW vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INSW drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSW and STM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INSW | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.49% | -94.40% | +36.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -36.35% | +20.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.40% | -66.66% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.40% | -66.66% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -10.47% | +8.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.78% | -55.08% | +34.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 16.12% | -10.27% |
Volatility
INSW vs. STM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) is 16.78%, while STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a volatility of 22.31%. This indicates that INSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INSW | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.78% | 22.31% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.47% | 44.40% | -14.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.18% | 56.14% | -17.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.38% | 45.82% | -4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.41% | 44.53% | +0.88% |
Dividends
INSW vs. STM - Dividend Comparison
INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, more than STM's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 9.41% | 6.04% | 16.05% | 13.83% | 3.84% | 9.26% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 0.50% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
Financials
INSW vs. STM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Seaways, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
INSW and STM have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STM has higher volatility (22.31%) compared to INSW (16.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSW dropped -57.49% vs STM's -94.40%.
INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INSW and STM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer