PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INSW vs. CF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INSW vs. CF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSW achieves a 116.16% return, which is significantly higher than CF's 63.40% return.


INSW

1D
1.02%
1M
23.66%
6M
75.93%
YTD
116.16%
1Y
171.90%
3Y*
47.43%
5Y*
56.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.02%

CF

1D
-0.46%
1M
15.75%
6M
35.55%
YTD
63.40%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
24.12%
10Y*
20.99%
ALL TIME*
21.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$259.19M$278.77M$321.72M
$46.42M$43.17M$49.32M

INSW vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
116.16%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
63.40%-7.17%10.08%-4.75%22.29%87.18%-15.76%12.73%5.13%40.24%

Correlation

The correlation between INSW and CF is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between INSW and CF has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INSW:

$4.76B

CF:

$19.23B

EPS

INSW:

$11.00

CF:

$11.18

PE Ratio

INSW:

8.75

CF:

11.20

PEG Ratio

INSW:

1.38

CF:

0.18

PS Ratio

INSW:

7.06

CF:

2.66

PB Ratio

INSW:

2.18

CF:

2.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

INSW:

$675.87M

CF:

$7.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INSW:

$274.33M

CF:

$2.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

INSW:

$525.75M

CF:

$2.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INSW vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CF
CF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INSW vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INSWCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.18

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.70

1.49

+9.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.60

3.31

+26.29

INSW vs. CF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSW Sharpe Ratio is 4.56, which is higher than the CF Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSW and CF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INSW vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSW drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum CF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSW and CF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INSWCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-76.73%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-25.45%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.40%

-29.16%

-21.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.40%

-48.36%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.65%

+8.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-24.87%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

11.44%

-5.61%

Volatility

INSW vs. CF - Volatility Comparison

International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) at 10.07%. This indicates that INSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INSWCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.15%

10.07%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.53%

35.61%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.05%

42.03%

-3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.83%

38.14%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.33%

40.08%

+5.25%

Dividends

INSW vs. CF - Dividend Comparison

INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, more than CF's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.60%2.59%2.34%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
8.66%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

INSW vs. CF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Seaways, Inc. and CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INSW and CF have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSW has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to CF (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSW dropped -57.49% vs CF's -76.73%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INSW and CF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer