INKM vs. SPYG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INKM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. INKM is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INKM returned 5.59%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for SPYG. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INKM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

INKM vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, INKM has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 5.59%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.

INKM

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 6M: 5.74%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 5.59%

SPYG

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 7.38%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 13.57%
• 1Y: 33.95%
• 3Y*: 28.16%
• 5Y*: 16.07%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INKM vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	5.61%	11.86%	5.70%	10.26%	-12.58%	8.52%	3.11%	17.12%	-5.32%	13.95%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	13.75%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	32.01%	33.46%	30.84%	-0.12%	27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between INKM and SPYG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012	0.63

The correlation between INKM and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INKM vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INKM	SPYG
Industrials	14.6%	5.0%
Utilities	13.9%	1.2%
Technology	13.2%	51.9%
Energy	11.1%	0.1%
Real Estate	10.9%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	1.0%
Financial Services	8.3%	8.5%
Healthcare	6.8%	5.8%
Communication Services	6.2%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	8.9%
Basic Materials	1.4%	0.3%

Return for Risk

INKM vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INKM

INKM Risk / Return Rank: 65
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 57
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INKM vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INKM	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.12	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.90	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.37	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.48	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.30	10.25	+1.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INKM vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INKM Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INKM and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INKM	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.12	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.76	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.88	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.35	+0.22

Drawdowns

INKM vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	INKM	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.58%	-67.63%	+39.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.55%	-13.76%	+9.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.25%	-22.14%	+12.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.18%	-32.67%	+13.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.58%	-32.67%	+4.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-1.13%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-24.33%	+20.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	3.32%	-2.17%

Volatility

INKM vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) is 1.67%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that INKM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INKM	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	4.35%	-2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.59%	12.46%	-7.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.95%	16.06%	-10.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.30%	21.17%	-12.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.78%	20.64%	-10.86%

INKM vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

INKM vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	4.86%	5.82%	4.83%	4.56%	5.03%	3.74%	3.88%	4.38%	4.08%	3.10%	3.39%	3.45%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INKM and SPYG in my portfolio?

INKM and SPYG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INKM or SPYG?

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INKM dropped -28.58% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

Which ETF is better, INKM or SPYG?

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 5.59% for INKM. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INKM or SPYG?

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INKM or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INKM or SPYG?

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

What is the main difference between INKM and SPYG?

INKM is categorized as Global Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for INKM and 0.04% for SPYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INKM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.