PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INKM vs. INCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INKM vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INKM vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
2.48%11.86%5.70%5.93%
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
3.78%13.07%6.80%5.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than INCM's 3.78% return.


INKM

1D
0.20%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
2.48%
6M
3.39%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
5.48%

INCM

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
3.78%
6M
5.96%
1Y
13.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INKM vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

INKM vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

INCM
INCM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INKM vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INKMINCMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.67

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

2.35

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.99

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.53

10.38

-1.85

INKM vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INKM Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the INCM Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INKM and INCM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INKMINCMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.67

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.45

-0.89

Correlation

The correlation between INKM and INCM is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

INKM vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, which matches INCM's 5.06% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
5.01%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
5.06%4.96%5.06%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

INKM vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and INCM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INKMINCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-7.84%

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-6.83%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-2.07%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-1.13%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.31%

-0.01%

Volatility

INKM vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) at 1.99%. This indicates that INKM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INKMINCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.99%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.62%

3.81%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

8.11%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.30%

7.33%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.77%

7.33%

+2.44%