INKM vs. CEFS
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS).
INKM and CEFS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INKM is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012. CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INKM or CEFS.
Correlation
The correlation between INKM and CEFS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
INKM vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
INKM:
1.08
CEFS:
2.37
INKM:
1.51
CEFS:
3.19
INKM:
1.19
CEFS:
1.41
INKM:
1.00
CEFS:
4.25
INKM:
5.19
CEFS:
13.95
INKM:
1.30%
CEFS:
1.81%
INKM:
6.21%
CEFS:
10.66%
INKM:
-28.58%
CEFS:
-38.99%
INKM:
-3.16%
CEFS:
-3.85%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 23.19% return.
INKM
5.88%
-1.51%
4.55%
6.18%
2.77%
3.89%
CEFS
23.19%
-0.74%
7.51%
24.50%
11.23%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INKM vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INKM vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
INKM vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison
INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than CEFS's 7.09% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 3.17% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% | 3.47% | 4.08% |
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 7.09% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 7.56% | 9.84% | 6.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
INKM vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and CEFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
INKM vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) is 1.98%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that INKM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.