PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFY vs. EQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INFY vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infosys Limited (INFY) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFY achieves a -35.16% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's -7.97% return. Over the past 10 years, INFY has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 6.06%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.75% annualized return.


INFY

1D
-1.57%
1M
7.00%
6M
-37.98%
YTD
-35.16%
1Y
-35.59%
3Y*
-8.63%
5Y*
-9.43%
10Y*
6.06%
ALL TIME*
13.28%

EQT

1D
-1.03%
1M
-3.29%
6M
-2.40%
YTD
-7.97%
1Y
-16.16%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
20.73%
10Y*
2.75%
ALL TIME*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFY vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INFY
Infosys Limited
-35.16%-16.30%23.06%4.78%-27.29%52.20%68.33%11.89%21.62%12.39%
EQT
EQT Corporation
-7.97%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between INFY and EQT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999

0.21

The correlation between INFY and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INFY:

$45.89B

EQT:

$30.68B

EPS

INFY:

$0.80

EQT:

$5.35

PE Ratio

INFY:

14.08

EQT:

9.16

PEG Ratio

INFY:

2.41

EQT:

0.07

PS Ratio

INFY:

2.31

EQT:

3.06

PB Ratio

INFY:

4.62

EQT:

1.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

INFY:

$20.16B

EQT:

$10.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INFY:

$6.08B

EQT:

$6.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

INFY:

$4.61B

EQT:

$7.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INFY vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFY
INFY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
INFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
INFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFY vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infosys Limited (INFY) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INFYEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.93

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.58

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

-1.35

-0.07

INFY vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFY and EQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INFY vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFY drawdown since its inception was -90.42%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFY and EQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INFYEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.42%

-91.51%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.00%

-27.89%

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.89%

-31.62%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.41%

-42.56%

-11.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.41%

-87.61%

+33.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.85%

-27.59%

-23.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-23.34%

-11.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.20%

13.21%

+11.99%

Volatility

INFY vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Infosys Limited (INFY) has a higher volatility of 16.15% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 6.35%. This indicates that INFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INFYEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.15%

6.35%

+9.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.40%

20.48%

+9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.59%

31.64%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.89%

42.31%

-13.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.64%

48.91%

-20.27%

Dividends

INFY vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

INFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than EQT's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.33%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%
INFY
Infosys Limited
4.60%2.91%2.66%2.33%2.24%1.58%1.71%3.10%3.43%2.52%2.26%2.12%

Financials

INFY vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Infosys Limited and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.04B
3.38B
(INFY) Total Revenue
(EQT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INFY vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Infosys Limited and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
30.9%
98.4%
Portfolio components
INFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Infosys Limited reported a gross profit of 1.56B and revenue of 5.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.9%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

INFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Infosys Limited reported an operating income of 1.06B and revenue of 5.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

INFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Infosys Limited reported a net income of 919.00M and revenue of 5.04B, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INFY and EQT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INFY has higher volatility (16.15%) compared to EQT (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFY dropped -90.42% vs EQT's -91.51%.

EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INFY and EQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer