INFR vs. XES
INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - INFR tracks the RARE Global Infrastructure Index while XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INFR returned 5.55%/yr vs 20.03%/yr for XES. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XES.
Performance
INFR vs. XES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 51.54% return.
INFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XES
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 51.54%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- 106.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- -2.41%
INFR vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.41% | 24.00% | -6.23% | 5.20% | -0.19% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 51.54% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFR and XES is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2022 | 0.20 |
The correlation between INFR and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INFR vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INFR
XES
Utilities
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
INFR
XES
-
Industrials
INFR
XES
Real Estate
INFR
XES
-
Basic Materials
INFR
-
XES
-
Communication Services
INFR
-
XES
-
Consumer Cyclical
INFR
-
XES
-
Consumer Defensive
INFR
-
XES
-
Energy
INFR
-
XES
Financial Services
INFR
-
XES
-
Healthcare
INFR
-
XES
-
Technology
INFR
-
XES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFR vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank
INFR
XES
INFR vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INFR | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 3.52 | -2.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 4.12 | -3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.51 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 11.21 | -9.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | 30.56 | -24.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INFR | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 3.52 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | -0.07 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
INFR vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFR drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR and XES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFR | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -95.65% | +76.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.43% | -9.84% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.55% | -45.95% | +27.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -91.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -70.73% | +70.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -54.36% | +49.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 3.61% | -1.57% |
Volatility
INFR vs. XES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is 0.00%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that INFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFR | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 8.25% | -8.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.86% | 20.51% | -16.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.04% | 30.52% | -21.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 39.04% | -24.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 45.05% | -30.78% |
INFR vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFR vs. XES - Dividend Comparison
INFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than XES's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 2.49% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.12% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFR and XES have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XES has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to INFR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFR dropped -19.28% vs XES's -95.65%.
On 3-year performance, XES leads with 20.03% vs 5.55% for INFR. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XES has performed better with a 20.03% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.
INFR has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.12% for XES.
INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.35% for XES.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INFR and XES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer