INFR vs. EFAV
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV).
INFR and EFAV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INFR is a passively managed fund by ClearBridge that tracks the performance of the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 14, 2022. EFAV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. Both INFR and EFAV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
INFR vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INFR vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.41% | 24.00% | -6.23% | 5.20% | -0.19% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 6.56% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | 0.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than EFAV's 6.56% return.
INFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- 17.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAV
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 6.56%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INFR vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INFR vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank
INFR
EFAV
INFR vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INFR | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.78 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 2.38 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 3.06 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 11.18 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INFR | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.78 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.55 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between INFR and EFAV is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
INFR vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison
INFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than EFAV's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 2.49% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.00% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
INFR vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFR drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR and EFAV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFR | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -27.56% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -7.14% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -3.12% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -4.78% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 1.95% | +0.32% |
Volatility
INFR vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is 0.00%, while iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that INFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INFR | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 4.83% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.25% | 7.57% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.68% | 12.22% | +2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 11.74% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 13.21% | +1.42% |