INEQ vs. VYM
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both Dividend funds. INEQ is actively managed, while VYM is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INEQ returned 9.92%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for VYM. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
INEQ vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, INEQ has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 9.92%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.16%
VYM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 24.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $606.92K | $766.57K | $703.44K | |
| $195.34M | $198.02M | $200.78M |
INEQ vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 12.10% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 14.21% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and VYM is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between INEQ and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
INEQ vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INEQ
VYM
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
INEQ
VYM
Industrials
INEQ
VYM
Basic Materials
INEQ
VYM
Consumer Defensive
INEQ
VYM
Energy
INEQ
VYM
Healthcare
INEQ
VYM
Communication Services
INEQ
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
INEQ
VYM
Utilities
INEQ
VYM
Real Estate
INEQ
VYM
Technology
INEQ
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
VYM
INEQ vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.56 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 13.40 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -56.98% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -6.69% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -14.46% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -15.84% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -35.21% | -6.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -1.15% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -7.14% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 1.78% | +1.18% |
Volatility
INEQ vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.46%. This indicates that INEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 2.46% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 7.42% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 10.29% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 13.87% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 16.29% | +0.08% |
INEQ vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than VYM's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.31% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.24% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and VYM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INEQ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to VYM (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.71% vs 9.92% for INEQ. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 2.24% for VYM.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer