CRUX vs. BFIX
CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and BFIX (Build Bond Innovation ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BFIX.
Performance
CRUX vs. BFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRUX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFIX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX vs. BFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.12% |
BFIX Build Bond Innovation ETF | -0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRUX and BFIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRUX vs. BFIX — Risk / Return Rank
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BFIX
CRUX vs. BFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRUX | BFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRUX vs. BFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum BFIX drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and BFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRUX | BFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -8.54% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.87% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -2.99% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility
CRUX vs. BFIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRUX | BFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 2.86% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 4.76% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 4.76% | -0.64% |
CRUX vs. BFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than BFIX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRUX vs. BFIX - Dividend Comparison
CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BFIX's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFIX Build Bond Innovation ETF | 3.54% | 3.73% | 4.38% | 4.30% | 1.58% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRUX and BFIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BFIX.
BFIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Build. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.45% for BFIX.
Find the right allocation for CRUX and BFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer