PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRUX vs. BFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRUX vs. BFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRUX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.62%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFIX

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.46%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRUX vs. BFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRUX and BFIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRUX vs. BFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRUX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BFIX
BFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRUX vs. BFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRUXBFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.60

CRUX vs. BFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRUX vs. BFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum BFIX drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and BFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRUXBFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-8.54%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.87%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-2.99%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

Volatility

CRUX vs. BFIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRUXBFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12%

2.86%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.12%

4.76%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

4.76%

-0.64%

CRUX vs. BFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than BFIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRUX vs. BFIX - Dividend Comparison

CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BFIX's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BFIX
Build Bond Innovation ETF
3.54%3.73%4.38%4.30%1.58%
CRUX
Columbia Core Bond ETF
1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRUX and BFIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BFIX.

BFIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Build. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.45% for BFIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRUX and BFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer