CRUX vs. BBAG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. CRUX is actively managed, while BBAG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BBAG.

Performance

CRUX vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRUX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBAG

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRUX vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	0.02%
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CRUX and BBAG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

CRUX vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBAG

BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 37
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRUX vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRUX	BBAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.33	-0.30

Drawdowns

CRUX vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and BBAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRUX	BBAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-18.73%	+16.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-2.62%	+2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-6.22%	+5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRUX	BBAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.35%	3.92%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.35%	5.92%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.35%	5.80%	-1.45%

CRUX vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRUX vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison

CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BBAG's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.36%	4.29%	4.25%	3.60%	2.23%	1.44%	2.26%	2.92%	0.16%
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRUX and BBAG in my portfolio?

CRUX and BBAG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRUX or BBAG?

On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRUX or BBAG?

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CRUX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRUX or BBAG?

BBAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.

What is the main difference between CRUX and BBAG?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.03% for BBAG.