CRUX vs. HTAB
CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for HTAB.
Performance
CRUX vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRUX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTAB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.02% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRUX and HTAB is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRUX vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank
CRUX
HTAB
CRUX vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRUX | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.44 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
CRUX vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum HTAB drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and HTAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRUX | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -14.76% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.81% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -2.89% | +2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
CRUX vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRUX | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 4.04% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 5.74% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 5.17% | -0.82% |
CRUX vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRUX vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison
CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than HTAB's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 3.83% | 3.88% | 3.57% | 3.21% | 2.26% | 2.18% | 1.64% | 2.77% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRUX and HTAB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.
HTAB has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.39% for HTAB.
Find the right allocation for CRUX and HTAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer