INEQ vs. CCEF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and CCEF (Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF) are both Dividend funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INEQ returned 28.80% vs 12.87% for CCEF. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for CCEF.

Performance

INEQ vs. CCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than CCEF's 6.53% return.

INEQ

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 4.84%
• 6M: 7.09%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 1Y: 28.80%
• 3Y*: 20.29%
• 5Y*: 13.46%
• 10Y*: 9.92%
• ALL TIME*: 10.16%

CCEF

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -0.32%
• 6M: 3.30%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 1Y: 12.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	$74.18K	$103.33K	$101.25K
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	$606.92K	$766.57K	$703.44K

INEQ vs. CCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	12.10%	39.85%	5.31%
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	6.53%	13.47%	17.80%

Correlation

The correlation between INEQ and CCEF is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024	0.61

The correlation between INEQ and CCEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

INEQ vs. CCEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INEQ

INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 84
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 86
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

CCEF

CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 57
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INEQ vs. CCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INEQ	CCEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.45	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	2.04	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.27	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	1.58	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.69	6.74	+2.94

INEQ vs. CCEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the CCEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INEQ and CCEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INEQ vs. CCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than CCEF's maximum drawdown of -13.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and CCEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	INEQ	CCEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.71%	-13.25%	-28.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-7.75%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.86%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.00%	-1.32%	-5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	1.81%	+1.15%

Volatility

INEQ vs. CCEF - Volatility Comparison

Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) at 2.06%. This indicates that INEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INEQ	CCEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	2.06%	+2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	7.14%	+4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	8.41%	+5.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.33%	10.66%	+4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.37%	10.66%	+5.71%

INEQ vs. CCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CCEF's 2.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

INEQ vs. CCEF - Dividend Comparison

INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than CCEF's 8.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	7.36%	8.08%	6.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	9.31%	9.76%	3.11%	3.27%	3.57%	3.43%	2.64%	3.34%	7.25%	4.63%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INEQ and CCEF in my portfolio?

INEQ and CCEF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INEQ or CCEF?

INEQ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to CCEF (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs CCEF's -13.25%.

Which ETF is better, INEQ or CCEF?

On 1-year performance, INEQ leads with 28.80% vs 12.87% for CCEF. On fees, INEQ is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INEQ or CCEF?

Over the 1-year period, INEQ has performed better with a 28.80% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INEQ or CCEF?

INEQ is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INEQ or CCEF?

INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 7.36% for CCEF.

What is the main difference between INEQ and CCEF?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 2.74% for CCEF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.