INDQ vs. QDF
INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. INDQ is actively managed, while QDF is passively managed. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDF.
Performance
INDQ vs. QDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INDQ
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QDF
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.77K | $11.88K | $46.17K | |
| $1.71M | $2.21M | $2.21M |
INDQ vs. QDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 2.93% |
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 15.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDQ and QDF is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDQ vs. QDF — Risk / Return Rank
INDQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDF
INDQ vs. QDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDQ | QDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDQ vs. QDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum QDF drawdown of -36.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and QDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDQ | QDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -36.67% | +27.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -0.21% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -3.61% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility
INDQ vs. QDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDQ | QDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 12.12% | +6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 15.64% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 17.37% | +1.60% |
INDQ vs. QDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than QDF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDQ vs. QDF - Dividend Comparison
INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 1.48% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 2.19% | 2.45% | 1.90% | 2.38% | 3.05% | 4.29% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDQ and QDF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.
QDF has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.37% for QDF.
Find the right allocation for INDQ and QDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer