INCO vs. DBEF
INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCO is a India Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index, while DBEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INCO returned 8.08%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for DBEF. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DBEF.
Performance
INCO vs. DBEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -8.71% return, which is significantly lower than DBEF's 13.76% return. Over the past 10 years, INCO has underperformed DBEF with an annualized return of 8.08%, while DBEF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.
INCO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- -8.71%
- 1Y
- -7.94%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.20%
DBEF
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
INCO vs. DBEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -8.71% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -7.01% | 19.28% | 14.55% | -4.22% | -10.81% | 53.28% |
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 13.76% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCO and DBEF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2011 | 0.44 |
INCO vs. DBEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCO
DBEF
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
INCO
DBEF
Consumer Defensive
INCO
DBEF
Healthcare
INCO
DBEF
Industrials
INCO
DBEF
Technology
INCO
DBEF
Basic Materials
INCO
-
DBEF
Communication Services
INCO
-
DBEF
Energy
INCO
-
DBEF
Financial Services
INCO
-
DBEF
Real Estate
INCO
-
DBEF
Utilities
INCO
-
DBEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCO vs. DBEF — Risk / Return Rank
INCO
DBEF
INCO vs. DBEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INCO | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.39 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.93 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 12.22 | -13.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INCO vs. DBEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than DBEF's maximum drawdown of -32.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and DBEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCO | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -32.46% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -9.41% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.98% | -14.62% | -15.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.98% | -14.95% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | -32.46% | -15.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.25% | -1.17% | -21.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -4.70% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 2.25% | +7.22% |
Volatility
INCO vs. DBEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) is 3.35%, while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that INCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCO | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 3.65% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 11.13% | +3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 13.08% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 13.81% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 15.58% | +4.71% |
INCO vs. DBEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCO vs. DBEF - Dividend Comparison
INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 2.29% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCO and DBEF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEF has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to INCO (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs DBEF's -32.46%.
On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.22% vs 8.08% for INCO. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INCO has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
INCO is categorized as India Equities, while DBEF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.35% for DBEF.
DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCO and DBEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer