INCO vs. GLIN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INCO tracks the Indxx India Consumer Index while GLIN tracks the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INCO returned 8.36%/yr vs 2.19%/yr for GLIN. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for GLIN.

Performance

INCO vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -10.88% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, INCO has outperformed GLIN with an annualized return of 8.36%, while GLIN has yielded a comparatively lower 2.19% annualized return.

INCO

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: -10.88%
• 6M: -10.64%
• 1Y: -10.26%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

GLIN

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: -2.85%
• 6M: -1.54%
• 1Y: -4.52%
• 3Y*: 10.66%
• 5Y*: 4.94%
• 10Y*: 2.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCO vs. GLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	-10.88%	0.59%	12.70%	34.63%	-7.01%	19.28%	14.55%	-4.22%	-10.81%	53.28%
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	-2.85%	-5.47%	15.64%	36.13%	-21.46%	29.57%	-0.29%	-21.49%	-37.41%	66.53%

Correlation

The correlation between INCO and GLIN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2011	0.73

The correlation between INCO and GLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

INCO vs. GLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INCO	GLIN
Consumer Cyclical	59.3%	14.2%
Consumer Defensive	37.5%	0.5%
Technology	1.9%	1.9%
Industrials	1.4%	20.5%
Basic Materials	-	8.7%
Communication Services	-	5.2%
Energy	-	2.3%
Financial Services	-	35.5%
Healthcare	-	8.4%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	3.5%

Return for Risk

INCO vs. GLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCO

INCO Risk / Return Rank: 3
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

GLIN

GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 6
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCO vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INCO	GLIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	-0.26	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	-0.26	-0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.97	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	-0.20	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	-0.59	-0.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INCO vs. GLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the GLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCO and GLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INCO	GLIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.62	-0.26	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.27	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.09	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	-0.09	+0.52

Drawdowns

INCO vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum GLIN drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and GLIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCO	GLIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.69%	-79.36%	+31.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.37%	-18.56%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.98%	-26.77%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	-30.97%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.69%	-74.80%	+27.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.10%	-44.78%	+20.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-50.97%	+40.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.24%	6.27%	+1.97%

Volatility

INCO vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) is 5.73%, while VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that INCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCO	GLIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	6.82%	-1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.22%	15.20%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.72%	17.47%	-0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	18.17%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.31%	23.69%	-3.38%

INCO vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCO vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison

INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	0.87%	0.84%	3.58%	0.96%	1.70%	0.00%	0.24%	1.42%	0.12%	0.10%	1.39%	3.11%
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.88%	3.81%	10.57%	6.25%	0.34%	0.28%	0.12%	0.05%	0.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCO and GLIN in my portfolio?

INCO and GLIN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCO or GLIN?

GLIN has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to INCO (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs GLIN's -79.36%.

Which ETF is better, INCO or GLIN?

On 10-year performance, INCO leads with 8.36% vs 2.19% for GLIN. On fees, INCO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, INCO has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCO or GLIN?

Over the 10-year period, INCO has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCO or GLIN?

INCO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCO or GLIN?

GLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.

What is the main difference between INCO and GLIN?

INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.82% for GLIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.