INCO vs. GLIN
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN).
INCO and GLIN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INCO is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Indxx India Consumer Index. It was launched on Aug 10, 2011. GLIN is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2010. Both INCO and GLIN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INCO or GLIN.
Correlation
The correlation between INCO and GLIN is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
INCO vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
INCO:
1.24
GLIN:
1.07
INCO:
1.84
GLIN:
1.48
INCO:
1.22
GLIN:
1.22
INCO:
1.11
GLIN:
0.38
INCO:
3.13
GLIN:
5.62
INCO:
5.44%
GLIN:
3.34%
INCO:
13.79%
GLIN:
17.45%
INCO:
-47.69%
GLIN:
-79.39%
INCO:
-14.68%
GLIN:
-39.11%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN's 17.26% return. Over the past 10 years, INCO has outperformed GLIN with an annualized return of 10.07%, while GLIN has yielded a comparatively lower 2.91% annualized return.
INCO
13.58%
-0.07%
-5.98%
16.29%
14.20%
10.07%
GLIN
17.26%
2.52%
1.67%
17.80%
10.74%
2.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INCO vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INCO vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
INCO vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison
INCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while GLIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 2.86% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.96% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.29% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 1.39% | 3.11% | 0.97% | 0.44% |
Drawdowns
INCO vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum GLIN drawdown of -79.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and GLIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
INCO vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison
Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) at 3.56%. This indicates that INCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.