INCO vs. INQQ
INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and INQQ (India Internet & Ecommerce ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INCO tracks the Indxx India Consumer Index while INQQ tracks the INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INCO returned 6.36%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for INQQ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for INQQ.
Performance
INCO vs. INQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly higher than INQQ's -18.74% return.
INCO
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -12.27%
- 6M
- -10.65%
- 1Y
- -11.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
INQQ
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -18.74%
- 6M
- -20.28%
- 1Y
- -23.27%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INCO vs. INQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -12.27% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -2.02% |
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF | -18.74% | -7.05% | 19.12% | 31.45% | -34.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCO and INQQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022 | 0.71 |
The correlation between INCO and INQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
INCO vs. INQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCO
INQQ
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
INCO
INQQ
Consumer Defensive
INCO
INQQ
Technology
INCO
INQQ
Industrials
INCO
INQQ
-
Basic Materials
INCO
-
INQQ
-
Communication Services
INCO
-
INQQ
Energy
INCO
-
INQQ
Financial Services
INCO
-
INQQ
Healthcare
INCO
-
INQQ
Real Estate
INCO
-
INQQ
-
Utilities
INCO
-
INQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCO vs. INQQ — Risk / Return Rank
INCO
INQQ
INCO vs. INQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INCO | INQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | -1.33 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | -1.92 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.78 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.77 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.64 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INCO | INQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | -1.33 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | -0.30 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
INCO vs. INQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than INQQ's maximum drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and INQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCO | INQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -40.53% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -30.41% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.98% | -32.45% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.29% | -28.49% | +3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -17.05% | +6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.30% | 14.20% | -5.90% |
Volatility
INCO vs. INQQ - Volatility Comparison
Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) have volatilities of 5.78% and 5.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCO | INQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 5.84% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 14.60% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 17.52% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 19.97% | -3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 19.97% | +0.34% |
INCO vs. INQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCO vs. INQQ - Dividend Comparison
INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF | 2.74% | 2.23% | 1.18% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCO and INQQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INQQ has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to INCO (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs INQQ's -40.53%.
On 3-year performance, INCO leads with 6.36% vs 2.70% for INQQ. On fees, INCO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, INCO has performed better with a 6.36% return vs 2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.
INQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while INQQ tracks INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and India. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.86% for INQQ.
INCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCO and INQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer