PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INCO vs. BKEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INCO vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -10.75% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 28.54% return.


INCO

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
-10.75%
6M
-9.88%
1Y
-9.38%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
8.34%

BKEM

1D
-1.31%
1M
5.40%
YTD
28.54%
6M
30.76%
1Y
52.98%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCO vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
INCO
Columbia India Consumer ETF
-10.75%0.59%12.70%34.63%-7.01%19.28%46.82%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
28.54%30.55%7.53%8.68%-19.43%-3.91%47.53%

Correlation

The correlation between INCO and BKEM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.51

The correlation between INCO and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

INCO vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INCO
BKEM

Consumer Cyclical

59.3%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

37.5%
2.9%

Technology

1.9%
35.9%

Industrials

1.4%
9.0%

Basic Materials

-

6.4%

Communication Services

-

6.6%

Energy

-

4.0%

Financial Services

-

18.9%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

INCO
59.3%
BKEM
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

INCO
37.5%
BKEM
2.9%

Technology

INCO
1.9%
BKEM
35.9%

Industrials

INCO
1.4%
BKEM
9.0%

Basic Materials

INCO

-

BKEM
6.4%

Communication Services

INCO

-

BKEM
6.6%

Energy

INCO

-

BKEM
4.0%

Financial Services

INCO

-

BKEM
18.9%

Healthcare

INCO

-

BKEM
3.2%

Real Estate

INCO

-

BKEM
1.2%

Utilities

INCO

-

BKEM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INCO vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCO
INCO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCO vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INCOBKEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.48

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

4.06

-4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

15.58

-16.71

INCO vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCO and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INCOBKEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

2.73

-3.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.38

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.74

-0.32

Drawdowns

INCO vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and BKEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INCOBKEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.69%

-39.48%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.37%

-13.11%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.98%

-18.38%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.98%

-36.53%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.00%

-2.25%

-21.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-15.99%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.35%

3.41%

+4.94%

Volatility

INCO vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) is 5.78%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that INCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INCOBKEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

8.13%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

16.82%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

19.52%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

18.73%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

19.12%

+1.19%

INCO vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

INCO vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.47%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INCO
Columbia India Consumer ETF
0.00%0.00%2.88%3.81%10.57%6.25%0.34%0.28%0.12%0.05%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


INCO and BKEM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKEM has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to INCO (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 7.09% vs 5.92% for INCO. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, INCO has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.

BKEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.

INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.11% for BKEM.

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INCO and BKEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer