INCO vs. BKEM
INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INCO tracks the Indxx India Consumer Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCO returned 5.92%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for BKEM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.
Performance
INCO vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -10.75% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 28.54% return.
INCO
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -10.75%
- 6M
- -9.88%
- 1Y
- -9.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
BKEM
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 6M
- 30.76%
- 1Y
- 52.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- —
INCO vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -10.75% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -7.01% | 19.28% | 46.82% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 28.54% | 30.55% | 7.53% | 8.68% | -19.43% | -3.91% | 47.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCO and BKEM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between INCO and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
INCO vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCO
BKEM
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
INCO
BKEM
Consumer Defensive
INCO
BKEM
Technology
INCO
BKEM
Industrials
INCO
BKEM
Basic Materials
INCO
-
BKEM
Communication Services
INCO
-
BKEM
Energy
INCO
-
BKEM
Financial Services
INCO
-
BKEM
Healthcare
INCO
-
BKEM
Real Estate
INCO
-
BKEM
Utilities
INCO
-
BKEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCO vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank
INCO
BKEM
INCO vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INCO | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.48 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 4.06 | -4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 15.58 | -16.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INCO | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 2.73 | -3.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.38 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.74 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
INCO vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and BKEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCO | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -39.48% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -13.11% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.98% | -18.38% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.98% | -36.53% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.00% | -2.25% | -21.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -15.99% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | 3.41% | +4.94% |
Volatility
INCO vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) is 5.78%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that INCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCO | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 8.13% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 16.82% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 19.52% | -2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 18.73% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 19.12% | +1.19% |
INCO vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCO vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.47% | 2.25% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCO and BKEM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKEM has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to INCO (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs BKEM's -39.48%.
On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 7.09% vs 5.92% for INCO. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, INCO has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.
BKEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.11% for BKEM.
BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCO and BKEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer