PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMO vs. MGEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMO vs. MGEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 33.46% return, which is significantly higher than MGEE's -1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IMO has outperformed MGEE with an annualized return of 17.09%, while MGEE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.


IMO

1D
1.30%
1M
-13.97%
YTD
33.46%
6M
35.20%
1Y
43.79%
3Y*
36.88%
5Y*
31.93%
10Y*
17.09%

MGEE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
-11.95%
3Y*
2.31%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
5.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMO vs. MGEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
33.46%43.85%10.47%20.89%38.00%95.29%-25.37%7.16%-17.21%-8.36%
MGEE
MGE Energy, Inc.
-1.89%-14.75%32.80%5.10%-12.57%19.90%-9.30%34.04%-2.90%-1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IMO and MGEE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.16

The correlation between IMO and MGEE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMO:

$55.27B

MGEE:

$2.78B

EPS

IMO:

$5.87

MGEE:

$3.90

PE Ratio

IMO:

19.43

MGEE:

19.48

PEG Ratio

IMO:

0.43

MGEE:

3.09

PS Ratio

IMO:

1.22

MGEE:

3.62

PB Ratio

IMO:

2.43

MGEE:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMO:

$46.55B

MGEE:

$767.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMO:

$7.69B

MGEE:

$744.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMO:

$6.36B

MGEE:

$282.54M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMO vs. MGEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMO
IMO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MGEE
MGEE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MGEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGEE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MGEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGEE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMO vs. MGEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOMGEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.92

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

-0.63

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

-1.12

+8.32

IMO vs. MGEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the MGEE Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMO and MGEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMO vs. MGEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.82%, which is greater than MGEE's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and MGEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOMGEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.82%

-33.91%

-50.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.23%

-19.07%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.95%

-30.88%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.72%

-30.88%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.96%

-33.91%

-43.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.17%

-27.03%

+9.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.18%

-7.66%

-13.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

10.65%

-4.54%

Volatility

IMO vs. MGEE - Volatility Comparison

Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE) at 6.11%. This indicates that IMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOMGEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

6.11%

+3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.86%

16.19%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

20.71%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.57%

23.29%

+9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.59%

27.44%

+8.15%

Dividends

IMO vs. MGEE - Dividend Comparison

IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than MGEE's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
2.02%2.40%2.84%2.73%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.36%2.02%1.70%1.66%
MGEE
MGE Energy, Inc.
2.50%2.36%1.87%2.31%2.26%1.84%2.06%1.75%2.20%2.00%1.85%2.49%

Financials

IMO vs. MGEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and MGE Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
12.45B
242.70M
(IMO) Total Revenue
(MGEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IMO vs. MGEE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Imperial Oil Limited and MGE Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
20.2%
99.0%
Portfolio components
IMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a gross profit of 2.51B and revenue of 12.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.

MGEE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGE Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 240.24M and revenue of 242.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.0%.

IMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

MGEE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGE Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 53.15M and revenue of 242.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.9%.

IMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a net income of 940.00M and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

MGEE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGE Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 48.48M and revenue of 242.70M, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMO and MGEE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMO has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to MGEE (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMO dropped -84.82% vs MGEE's -33.91%.

IMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMO and MGEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer