IMMR vs. NUKZ
IMMR (Immersion Corporation) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, IMMR returned -14.13% vs 5.48% for NUKZ. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMMR vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's -1.84% return.
IMMR
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- -14.13%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- -0.41%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.17%
NUKZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -11.94%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.65%
IMMR vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | -2.12% | -18.30% | 25.64% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | -1.84% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMMR and NUKZ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMMR vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
IMMR
NUKZ
IMMR vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMMR | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.05 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 0.30 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 0.70 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMMR vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMMR | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -33.03% | -65.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.48% | -18.23% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.91% | -18.23% | -71.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.21% | -6.30% | -81.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.11% | 7.83% | +7.28% |
Volatility
IMMR vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a higher volatility of 11.39% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 6.47%. This indicates that IMMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMMR | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.39% | 6.47% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.95% | 23.01% | +4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.69% | 30.55% | +10.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.82% | 32.65% | +13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.93% | 32.65% | +18.28% |
Dividends
IMMR vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than NUKZ's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 4.90% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMMR and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to NUKZ (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMMR and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer