IMCV vs. QQQJ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ).
IMCV and QQQJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMCV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. QQQJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both IMCV and QQQJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IMCV vs. QQQJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMCV vs. QQQJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 3.40% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -6.98% | 33.56% | 14.36% |
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | -1.59% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 13.68% | -28.25% | 9.76% | 15.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly higher than QQQJ's -1.59% return.
IMCV
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
QQQJ
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMCV vs. QQQJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQJ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IMCV vs. QQQJ — Risk / Return Rank
IMCV
QQQJ
IMCV vs. QQQJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMCV | QQQJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 1.71 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.87 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.39 | 7.73 | -1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMCV | QQQJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.14 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.30 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCV and QQQJ is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMCV vs. QQQJ - Dividend Comparison
IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than QQQJ's 0.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 2.06% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.89% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IMCV vs. QQQJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than QQQJ's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and QQQJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCV | QQQJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -39.57% | -25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -13.54% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -39.57% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -8.00% | +3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -16.20% | +7.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.28% | -0.43% |
Volatility
IMCV vs. QQQJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 4.01%, while Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMCV | QQQJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 8.68% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 14.52% | -5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 22.37% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 21.98% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 22.11% | -2.42% |