PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCV vs. JSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCV vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly lower than JSMD's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCV has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 10.54%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.


IMCV

1D
-0.59%
1M
4.45%
6M
10.82%
YTD
14.96%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
9.85%

JSMD

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.82%
6M
9.06%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
12.94%
ALL TIME*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCV vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
14.96%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
16.93%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and JSMD is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.74

The correlation between IMCV and JSMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMCV vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCV
JSMD

Financial Services

17.7%
9.3%

Industrials

11.6%
22.1%

Energy

11.4%
1.0%

Healthcare

10.3%
20.3%

Utilities

10.1%

-

Technology

9.3%
27.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.0%

Real Estate

5.5%
2.9%

Basic Materials

4.8%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.7%

Financial Services

IMCV
17.7%
JSMD
9.3%

Industrials

IMCV
11.6%
JSMD
22.1%

Energy

IMCV
11.4%
JSMD
1.0%

Healthcare

IMCV
10.3%
JSMD
20.3%

Utilities

IMCV
10.1%
JSMD

-

Technology

IMCV
9.3%
JSMD
27.7%

Consumer Defensive

IMCV
8.6%
JSMD
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCV
8.4%
JSMD
9.0%

Real Estate

IMCV
5.5%
JSMD
2.9%

Basic Materials

IMCV
4.8%
JSMD
2.6%

Communication Services

IMCV
2.4%
JSMD
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCV vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCV vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCVJSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.18

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.48

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

4.89

+8.06

IMCV vs. JSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the JSMD Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and JSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than JSMD's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and JSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVJSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-38.98%

-25.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-14.86%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-24.01%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-32.18%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

-38.98%

-7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-5.98%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-7.42%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

4.48%

-2.63%

Volatility

IMCV vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 2.88%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVJSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

5.96%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

17.45%

-9.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

22.19%

-10.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

23.07%

-6.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

22.81%

-3.26%

IMCV vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMCV vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than JSMD's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.84%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.43%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCV and JSMD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to IMCV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs JSMD's -38.98%.

On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 12.94% vs 10.54% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.

IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while JSMD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.30% for JSMD.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCV and JSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer