IMCV vs. DIV
IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IMCV tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index while DIV tracks the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCV returned 10.80%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for DIV. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
IMCV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCV has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 10.80%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.14% annualized return.
IMCV
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
IMCV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 11.06% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -6.98% | 33.56% | -4.11% | 24.72% | -10.93% | 12.60% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCV and DIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IMCV and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IMCV vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMCV
DIV
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Technology
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
IMCV
DIV
Energy
IMCV
DIV
Industrials
IMCV
DIV
Technology
IMCV
DIV
-
Utilities
IMCV
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
IMCV
DIV
Consumer Defensive
IMCV
DIV
Healthcare
IMCV
DIV
Basic Materials
IMCV
DIV
Real Estate
IMCV
DIV
Communication Services
IMCV
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMCV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
IMCV
DIV
IMCV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMCV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.98 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 8.09 | +4.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMCV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -52.74% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -5.23% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.63% | -12.33% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -21.14% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.33% | -52.74% | +6.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -1.67% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -7.01% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.92% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IMCV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 3.11%, while Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMCV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 3.68% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 7.54% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.75% | 10.64% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 13.69% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 18.00% | +1.61% |
IMCV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMCV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than DIV's 6.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.91% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMCV and DIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIV has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to IMCV (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 10.80% vs 4.14% for DIV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 1.91% for IMCV.
IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.45% for DIV.
IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMCV and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer