IMCG vs. USL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCG returned 14.46%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for USL. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMCG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.

Performance

IMCG vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has outperformed USL with an annualized return of 14.46%, while USL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.

IMCG

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 8.33%
• YTD: 20.05%
• 6M: 18.28%
• 1Y: 23.35%
• 3Y*: 18.91%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 14.46%

USL

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: 63.07%
• 6M: 59.66%
• 1Y: 57.86%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 17.41%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	20.05%	6.55%	18.14%	20.73%	-25.79%	15.39%	45.64%	35.70%	-3.68%	25.57%
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP	63.07%	-12.37%	8.30%	-1.11%	27.10%	62.48%	-25.23%	28.01%	-14.15%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and USL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007	0.28

The correlation between IMCG and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMCG vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMCG	USL
Technology	30.4%	-
Industrials	26.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	-
Financial Services	9.1%	4.5%
Healthcare	7.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.5%	-
Real Estate	3.4%	-
Utilities	2.7%	-
Communication Services	2.6%	-
Energy	2.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

IMCG vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG

IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 44
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

USL

USL Risk / Return Rank: 56
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMCG	USL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.04	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.58	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	3.47	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	7.02	+1.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMCG vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMCG	USL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.04	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.58	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.34	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.01	+0.53

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and USL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCG	USL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.96%	-89.06%	+30.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.17%	-16.76%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.92%	-23.33%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.08%	-33.82%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.08%	-66.02%	+30.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-38.16%	+37.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.22%	-61.46%	+52.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	8.27%	-5.66%

Volatility

IMCG vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is 4.65%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that IMCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMCG	USL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	10.53%	-5.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.53%	23.33%	-10.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.53%	28.54%	-13.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.17%	30.08%	-9.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	32.35%	-11.84%

IMCG vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMCG vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.65%	0.78%	0.78%	0.85%	0.91%	0.41%	0.09%	0.30%	0.35%	0.45%	0.52%	0.38%
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCG and USL in my portfolio?

IMCG and USL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMCG or USL?

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to IMCG (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs USL's -89.06%.

Which ETF is better, IMCG or USL?

On 10-year performance, IMCG leads with 14.46% vs 10.91% for USL. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMCG or USL?

Over the 10-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMCG or USL?

IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMCG or USL?

IMCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

What is the main difference between IMCG and USL?

IMCG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCG and 0.88% for USL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.